Как происходит разрешение peer depencies
Одной из лучших особенностей pnpm является то, что в одном проекте конкретная версия пакета всегда будет иметь один набор зависимостей. There is one exception from this rule, though - packages with peer dependencies.
Peer-зависимости разрешаются из зависимостей, установленных вы ше в графе зависимостей, пока их версии совпадают с версиями родительских пакетов. That means
that if [email protected] has two peers (bar@^1 and baz@^1) then it might have
multiple different sets of dependencies in the same project.
- foo-parent-1
- [email protected]
- [email protected]
- [email protected]
- foo-parent-2
- [email protected]
- [email protected]
- [email protected]
In the example above, [email protected] is installed for foo-parent-1 and
foo-parent-2. Both packages have bar and baz as well, but they depend on
different versions of baz. As a result, [email protected] has two different sets of
dependencies: one with [email protected] and the other one with [email protected]. To
support these use cases, pnpm has to hard link [email protected] as many times as
there are different dependency sets.
Normally, if a package does not have peer dependencies, it is hard linked to a
node_modules folder next to symlinks of its dependencies, like so:
node_modules
└── .pnpm
├── [email protected]
│ └── node_modules
│ ├── foo
│ ├── qux -> ../../[email protected]/node_modules/qux
│ └── plugh -> ../../[email protected]/node_modules/plugh
├── [email protected]
├── [email protected]
However, if foo has peer dependencies, there may be multiple sets of
dependencies for it, so we create different sets for different peer dependency
resolutions:
node_modules
└── .pnpm
├── [email protected][email protected][email protected]
│ └── node_modules
│ ├── foo
│ ├── bar -> ../../[email protected]/node_modules/bar
│ ├── baz -> ../../[email protected]/node_modules/baz
│ ├── qux -> ../../[email protected]/node_modules/qux
│ └── plugh -> ../../[email protected]/node_modules/plugh
├── [email protected][email protected][email protected]
│ └── node_modules
│ ├── foo
│ ├── bar -> ../../[email protected]/node_modules/bar
│ ├── baz -> ../../[email protected]/node_modules/baz
│ ├── qux -> ../../[email protected]/node_modules/qux
│ └── plugh -> ../../[email protected]/node_modules/plugh
├── [email protected]
├── [email protected]
├── [email protected]
├── [email protected]
├── [email protected]
We create symlinks either to the foo that is inside
[email protected][email protected][email protected] or to the one in
[email protected][email protected][email protected].
Как следствие, загрузчик модулей в Node.js найдет правильные peer dependencies.
If a package has no peer dependencies but has dependencies with peers that are
resolved higher in the graph, then that transitive package can appear in the
project with different sets of dependencies. For instance, there's package
[email protected] with a single dependency [email protected]. [email protected] has a peer dependency
c@^1. [email protected] will never resolve the peers of [email protected], so it becomes
dependent from the peers of [email protected] as well.
Here's how that structure will look in node_modules. In this example,
[email protected] will need to appear twice in the project's node_modules - resolved
once with [email protected] and again with [email protected].
node_modules
└── .pnpm
├── [email protected][email protected]
│ └── node_modules
│ ├── a
│ └── b -> ../../[email protected][email protected]/node_modules/b
├── [email protected][email protected]
│ └── node_modules
│ ├── a
│ └── b -> ../../[email protected][email protected]/node_modules/b
├── [email protected][email protected]
│ └── node_modules
│ ├── b
│ └── c -> ../../[email protected]/node_modules/c
├── [email protected][email protected]
│ └── node_modules
│ ├── b
│ └── c -> ../../[email protected]/node_modules/c
├── [email protected]
├── [email protected]